In Galatians 2:11-21, Paul confronted Peter to show that justification comes through faith in Jesus Christ, not through obeying the law. When Peter stopped eating with Gentile believers because of pressure from the "circumcision group," Paul criticized him for not following the truth of the gospel (Gal. 2:14). This event highlighted the conflict between following Jewish customs and the inclusive nature of the gospel. Paul emphasized that no one can be justified by "the works of the law," which refers to the Mosaic Law, but only through faith in Christ (Gal. 2:16). John Wesley pointed out that this passage clearly demonstrates that salvation comes through faith as a gift of grace, rather than through human effort or legalistic adherence (Collins). Wesley's theology aligns with Paul's message, teaching that while the law reveals sin, it cannot bring about salvation; only faith in Christ can bring justification.
Paul's argument in Galatians 2:16 is supported by cross-references within his epistles that emphasize the same doctrine. For instance, in Romans 3:28, Paul asserts, "For we maintain that a person is justified by faith apart from the works of the law." Similarly, in Ephesians 2:8-9, Paul declares, "For it is by grace you have been saved, through faith—and this is not from yourselves, it is the gift of God—not by works, so that no one can boast." These cross-references reinforce the idea that justification comes solely from faith in Christ's redemptive work, not from observing the law. Wesleyan theology holds that these passages collectively affirm the doctrine of sola fide (faith alone), emphasizing that any reliance on legalistic practices undermines the sufficiency of Christ’s atonement (Maddox).
Furthermore, Galatians 2:19-20 strengthens this argument by illustrating the believer's connection with Christ through faith. Paul explains that through the law, he "died to the law" so that he might "live for God," a life now defined by being "crucified with Christ" and Christ living in him (Gal. 2:19-20). This metaphor of crucifixion with Christ signifies the believer's departure from the old legalistic system and the beginning of a new life empowered by grace. In this new life, righteousness is not earned by the law but is a demonstration of Christ’s life within the believer. Wesley sees this union with Christ as the heart of sanctification, where believers progressively conform to Christ’s image through faith, not through their adherence to the law (Maddox). This passage highlights that the law's role is limited to revealing sin, whereas faith in Christ brings both justification and ongoing sanctification.
The Book of Galatians is an epistle, or letter, written by the Apostle Paul to the churches in the region of Galatia, located in modern-day Turkey. The name "Galatians" refers to the people of Galatia, a region inhabited by Celtic tribes known as the Gauls who had settled there around the 3rd century BCE (Longenecker). The letter is known for addressing significant theological issues concerning the nature of the Gospel and the role of the Mosaic Law in the Christian faith.
The Apostle Paul is universally recognized as the author of Galatians. His authorship is confirmed both by internal evidence—such as the autobiographical sections where Paul recounts his personal history and interactions with the apostles in Jerusalem (Galatians 1:11-24)—and by the strong stylistic similarities with his other epistles (Bruce). Early church tradition further supports Paul’s authorship, with early Christian writers like Irenaeus and Tertullian affirming his authorship (Longenecker).
There is some debate among scholars regarding the date of the epistle. The two primary theories are the 'North Galatian' theory, which suggests that Paul addressed the letter to ethnic Galatians in the region's northern part, and the 'South Galatian' theory, which is more widely accepted and suggests that Paul wrote the letter to churches in the Roman province of Galatia in the south. The South Galatian theory proposes that Paul wrote the letter around 48-50 CE, after his first missionary journey and before the Jerusalem Council (Acts 15). The North Galatian theory, on the other hand, dates the letter to around 54-56 CE, during Paul's third missionary journey (Bruce).
Paul wrote Galatians to address a crisis in the Galatian churches. False teachers, often identified as Judaizers, had infiltrated these communities, insisting that Gentile Christians must observe the Mosaic Law, particularly circumcision, to be fully part of God’s people (Galatians 1:6-7). Paul’s primary purpose in writing was to reaffirm the true Gospel of salvation by grace through faith in Jesus Christ, apart from works of the Law (Galatians 2:16). He passionately defends the doctrine of justification by faith. He argues that believers are free from the Law’s bondage, emphasizing the role of the Holy Spirit in a believer's life (Galatians 5:1).
Major themes in Galatians include the contrast between law and grace, the role of faith in justification, Christian freedom, the work of the Holy Spirit, and the unity of all believers in Christ regardless of ethnic or cultural background (Bruce).
The structure of Galatians can be divided into three main sections:
Galatians is a foundational text for Christian theology, especially in its articulation of the doctrine of justification by faith, which was pivotal during the Protestant Reformation. Martin Luther, for instance, viewed Galatians as one of the most important books of the New Testament, often referring to it as his "Katie von Bora," after his wife, due to his deep affection for it (Luther). The letter’s emphasis on Christian liberty and its explicit rejection of any form of legalism continues to be a source of encouragement and instruction for Christians today, reminding believers of their freedom and new life in Christ.
Galatians 2:11
Paul's boldness is clearly seen in this verse. "Cephas" (Peter) was a prominent leader in the early church, and Antioch was a key center for early Christian mission. Paul's confrontation with Peter was public and direct. The word "condemned" (κατεγνωσμένος, katagnōsmenos) indicates that Peter’s actions were not simply wrong, but deserving of serious reprimand (Moo). This sets the stage for the discussion on the importance of living consistently with the gospel.
Galatians 2:12
This passage underscores the social and theological pressures that Peter faced. At first, Peter dined with Gentile believers, which was significant because sharing meals implied full fellowship. However, when certain men "from James" (likely from the Jerusalem church, although not necessarily representing James's own views) arrived, Peter withdrew. This was probably due to fear of criticism from the circumcision group, who believed that Gentile Christians should observe Jewish laws, including circumcision (Witherington). Peter’s withdrawal was an act of hypocrisy, contradicting the truth of the gospel, which unites Jews and Gentiles in Christ.
Galatians 2:13
Peter’s actions had a ripple effect. The term “hypocrisy” (ὑπόκρισις, hypokrisis) is used to describe behavior that does not align with one's professed beliefs. Paul’s concern here is not just Peter’s behavior but its impact on others, including Barnabas, who was a significant leader and Paul’s missionary companion (Longenecker). This verse underscores how influential leaders' actions can lead others away from the truth of the gospel.
Galatians 2:14
Paul emphasizes the importance of living in line with “the truth of the gospel.” His public rebuke of Peter points out the inconsistency in Peter’s behavior. While Peter lived “like a Gentile” in that he did not strictly observe Jewish customs, he was now implying that Gentiles needed to adopt Jewish practices to be fully accepted. This was a fundamental denial of the gospel message, which Paul saw as unifying all believers, regardless of their ethnic background (Moo).
Galatians 2:15
Paul begins to transition from recounting the confrontation to a theological reflection. The phrase “Jews by birth” versus “sinful Gentiles” reflects common Jewish attitudes of the time. Jews considered themselves as God's covenant people, distinct from Gentiles who were often seen as “sinners” due to their pagan practices. However, Paul is setting up the argument that being Jewish by birth does not grant one a special status in terms of justification (Dunn).
Galatians 2:16
This verse is central to Paul's argument about justification. "Justified" (δικαιόω, dikaioō) means to be declared righteous by God. Paul asserts that this justification is not achieved by “the works of the law” (i.e., observing Jewish law) but through faith in Jesus Christ (Fung). This marks a significant departure from the Jewish understanding of the law, emphasizing that it is faith in Christ, not adherence to the law, that brings justification. Paul underscores that even Jews, like himself and Peter, are justified in the same way as Gentiles—by faith.
Galatians 2:17
Paul addresses a potential objection: if Jews abandon the law to be justified by faith in Christ, does that make Christ an agent of sin? Paul emphatically rejects this notion. The concern is that if the law no longer defines righteousness, then believers might be seen as sinners. However, Paul argues that Christ does not lead believers into sin but liberates them from the law’s condemnation (Longenecker).
Galatians 2:18
Paul illustrates that returning to the law after embracing faith in Christ would make him a “lawbreaker.” This suggests that by relying on the law again, Paul would be acknowledging its inability to justify, thus making himself a transgressor. The “rebuilding” metaphor refers to the attempt to reestablish the law as the means of justification, which would contradict the gospel (Moo).
Galatians 2:19
Here, Paul describes his relationship with the law. “Through the law” refers to how the law, in its role of pointing out sin, led Paul to see its limitations and thus “die” to it as a means of justification. This death to the law allows him to “live for God,” a life that is now oriented toward faith and grace rather than legalistic observance (Fung).
Galatians 2:20
This verse encapsulates Paul’s theology of union with Christ. Being “crucified with Christ” signifies a profound personal identification with Christ’s death, which leads to a new way of life where Christ’s presence is central. Paul’s life is now defined by “faith in the Son of God,” which emphasizes a continual reliance on Christ’s love and sacrifice. This verse highlights the transformative power of the gospel, where the believer’s old life is replaced by a new life in Christ (Dunn).
Galatians 2:21
Paul concludes this section with a strong affirmation of the necessity of grace. To rely on the law for righteousness would be to “set aside the grace of God.” This would make Christ’s death meaningless, as it would imply that salvation could be achieved by human effort rather than divine grace. Paul’s argument is that the gospel is fundamentally about God’s grace, and to add legal requirements to it is to negate the very essence of the gospel (Witherington).
Galatians 2:11-22 is a crucial passage for understanding Paul’s defense of the gospel of grace against the imposition of Jewish legal requirements on Gentile believers. From a Wesleyan/Methodist theological perspective, this passage highlights key themes such as the universality of grace, the relationship between faith and works, and the transformative power of Christ's atoning work.
1. Universality of Grace
In this passage, Paul confronts Peter in defense of the inclusivity of the gospel. Wesleyan theology emphasizes prevenient grace, which is the grace that precedes and makes salvation available to all people. John Wesley stressed that God's grace is offered universally to everyone, not restricted by ethnicity or adherence to the Mosaic law (Collins). Paul's rebuke of Peter highlights this universal offer of grace, as Peter's separation from Gentile Christians was viewed as a rejection of the gospel's inclusive nature. In the Wesleyan tradition, this is reflected in the belief that salvation is accessible to all through faith in Jesus Christ, rather than through legalistic adherence to the law (Outler).
2. Faith and Works
Galatians 2:16 teaches that justification comes through faith, but this faith should be demonstrated through good works. Wesley emphasized that although we are not justified by works, genuine faith will naturally result in good works as a reflection of the Holy Spirit's presence in the believer's life (Collins). Paul's statement, "a person is not justified by the works of the law, but by faith in Jesus Christ" (Gal. 2:16), is in line with Wesleyan theology. According to Wesleyan beliefs, faith alone justifies, but genuine faith is always accompanied by acts of love (Outler).
3. Transformative Power of Christ’s Atonement
Galatians 2:20 is a powerful statement about the personal and transformative nature of salvation, which is a central theme in Wesleyan theology. When Paul says that he has been "crucified with Christ" and that "Christ lives in me," he emphasizes the transformative impact of Christ’s atonement. For Wesley, salvation wasn't just a legal declaration of righteousness but also the impartation of righteousness, where the believer is transformed and empowered to live a holy life (Maddox). This reflects the Wesleyan concept of sanctification, where the believer’s life is increasingly conformed to the image of Christ through the ongoing work of the Holy Spirit.
4. Justification by Faith as Central to the Gospel
Paul's argument in Galatians 2:21, "if righteousness could be gained through the law, Christ died for nothing!" aligns with the Wesleyan belief in the absolute necessity of grace for salvation. Wesley adamantly opposed any hint of legalism suggesting that human works or law adherence could lead to righteousness. Instead, he emphasized that justification is entirely a result of God's grace, which is received through faith. This belief is fundamental in Methodist doctrine, where the sufficiency of Christ's atoning work is emphasized, and any effort to earn salvation through the law is viewed as undermining the essence of the gospel itself (Maddox).
Galatians 2:11-12: Confronting Hypocrisy and Defending Unity
In these verses, Paul recounts his confrontation with Peter in Antioch, where Peter’s withdrawal from Gentile believers is depicted as an act of hypocrisy. From a Wesleyan perspective, this confrontation underscores the vital importance of Christian unity and the universal offer of grace. John Wesley emphasized the inclusive nature of the gospel, asserting that God’s grace is available to all people, irrespective of ethnic or cultural background (Collins). Peter’s behavior, which suggested that Gentiles needed to adopt Jewish customs to be fully accepted, was a denial of this inclusive gospel. Wesley would have viewed such actions as antithetical to the doctrine of prevenient grace, which holds that God’s grace is at work in everyone, preparing them to receive the gospel (Maddox).
Galatians 2:13: The Ripple Effect of Leadership Failures
Paul notes that Peter’s actions led other Jewish believers, including Barnabas, to follow suit in hypocrisy. This highlights the significant influence of leadership in the church. Wesleyan theology places a strong emphasis on holiness and authenticity in Christian living, particularly for leaders (Outler). Wesley insisted that leaders must embody the gospel in both word and deed, as their actions have the power to either build up or undermine the faith of others. The Methodist tradition, with its emphasis on connectionalism and the communal aspects of faith, recognizes the serious implications of Peter’s actions in sowing division within the body of Christ (Collins).
Galatians 2:14: The Gospel of Grace vs. Legalism
Paul’s public rebuke of Peter highlights the conflict between the gospel of grace and the pressures of legalism. Wesleyan theology strongly aligns with Paul’s stance, emphasizing that the gospel is centered on God’s grace, which is received through faith and not by adherence to the law. Wesley contended that any form of legalism that sought to impose additional requirements for salvation undermined the sufficiency of Christ’s atoning work (Maddox). For Wesley, living “in line with the truth of the gospel” meant embodying the principles of grace, love, and inclusivity, rather than reverting to legalistic practices that divide rather than unite believers (Outler).
Galatians 2:15-16: Justification by Faith
Paul’s assertion that justification comes through faith in Jesus Christ, and not by “the works of the law,” is foundational to Wesleyan soteriology. Wesley taught that justification is by faith alone, but this faith is transformative, leading to a life of holiness and good works as a natural outflow of the believer’s relationship with God (Collins). In Wesleyan theology, this verse is crucial because it upholds the doctrine of justification by faith while also pointing towards sanctification, the process of being made holy through the work of the Holy Spirit. Wesley rejected the notion that the law could justify, insisting that faith in Christ is both the beginning and the means by which one lives a righteous life (Maddox).
Galatians 2:17-18: The Dangers of Reverting to Legalism
Paul argues that if believers who seek to be justified in Christ are found to be sinners, it does not mean that Christ promotes sin. Instead, the real issue is returning to the law as a means of justification, which Paul equates with becoming a “lawbreaker.” In Wesleyan thought, this represents the danger of backsliding—the idea that one might return to old ways of thinking and living, abandoning the grace by which they were saved (Collins). Wesley taught that while Christians are called to live holy lives, this holiness is always a response to grace, not a precondition for it (Outler). Returning to legalism, therefore, undermines the transformative work of grace that should characterize the life of a believer.
Galatians 2:19-20: The Crucified Life and Sanctification
In these verses, Paul describes his own experience of dying to the law and living for God, which he expresses through the powerful imagery of being “crucified with Christ.” This resonates deeply with Wesleyan theology, which emphasizes the sanctified life—a life that is increasingly conformed to the image of Christ through the ongoing work of the Holy Spirit (Maddox). Wesley believed that this identification with Christ’s death and resurrection was not just a metaphor but a reality in the believer’s life, where the old self is crucified and the new self, empowered by grace, lives in righteousness. This passage is often cited in Methodist teachings on entire sanctification, the process by which believers are made holy in love (Collins).
Galatians 2:21: The Necessity of Grace
Paul concludes by emphasizing that if righteousness could be gained through the law, then “Christ died for nothing.” This statement is a powerful affirmation of the centrality of grace in Wesleyan theology. Wesley preached that salvation is by grace through faith, and that any attempt to earn it through legalistic means nullifies the grace of God (Outler). For Wesley, the doctrine of justification by grace through faith is the heart of the gospel, and it is this grace that empowers believers to live holy lives. Therefore, any return to the law as a means of righteousness is seen as a rejection of the transformative power of Christ’s atoning work (Maddox).
• Bruce, F. F. The Epistle to the Galatians: A Commentary on the Greek Text. Eerdmans, 1982.
• Collins, Kenneth J. The Theology of John Wesley: Holy Love and the Shape of Grace. Abingdon Press, 2007.
• Dunn, James D.G. The Epistle to the Galatians. Hendrickson, 1993.
• Fung, Ronald Y. K. The Epistle to the Galatians. Eerdmans, 1988.
• Longenecker, Richard N. Galatians. Word Books, 1990.
• Luther, Martin. Commentary on Galatians. Translated by Theodore Graebner, Zondervan, 1949.
• Maddox, Randy L. Responsible Grace: John Wesley's Practical Theology. Kingswood Books, 1994.
• Moo, Douglas J. Galatians. Baker Academic, 2013.
• Outler, Albert C., editor. John Wesley's Sermons: An Anthology. Abingdon Press, 1991.
• Witherington, Ben. Grace in Galatia: A Commentary on St. Paul's Letter to the Galatians. Eerdmans, 1998.
